Sex Selection and Gender Imbalance in India

beautiful!

There are many reasons that if you selectively abort any baby it should be the males

One of the greatest con games in history is males making women think that we males are the superior sex. In reality, women and males are not even equal. Women are far superior to the males. Many things in your article shows this Although you may not agree that women are superior to male I believe that out of 100 good points, women have at least 90 of them We are tied in another 5 and males have the rest of the good points.

All of nature has a focus on the female and the male is just a supporting the female. This is true for humans too, women are the stars of this play called life and males are but supporting actors.

Antlers serve only to allow combat between males, and to get the males killed during hunting season.

Brightly colored or patterned plumage on male birds only puts them on display so the female just stands by to watch her counterpart be picked off by predators as she remains safe.

You mentioned male combat. Many species have males fighting often until one or both are dead and if both males are dead, the female just moves on to the next male.

I have seen birds whereby the male is chasing the female and she flies just in front of a moving car. The male does not notice and flies into the car. I cannot help but think that the female did this to get the male killed. No I do not think all animals are that smart but I do think females are. I have seen a female rabbit kill a male rabbit buy buring him in a hole he entered. Also I think if we check about 90% of the road kill would be, male.

Human males win almost all of the Darwin Awards, awards given to those who kill themself doing stupid things. It took several years and several hundred males before the first woman made the runners up list.

In humans it is the woman that choses. Almost any woman can and does have sex with the male or males of her choice yet there are a great percentage of males that have never had nor ever will have sex with a woman. SHE calls the shots. Yes some males may force sex upon a woman (and in which case even though I am a male, to put it bluntly, that male should be hung by his balls in public after being stripped naked and having women tie the rope or better yet, thin wire around his nuts).

So in all of this agree or not, your article does again show that the female of every species is superior to the male and women (I will not call women a female as she is superior) are superior to the males. Because I am a male, do I regret that women are superior to us? Not in the least nor do I resent women are vastly superior to males. I am glad they are because when I look at most of the males around me, I would hate to think males are superior!
It is the male who gets down on his knee ( a sign that he knows she is superior to him) and ask her to marry him which she can refuse.

"Why are women so undervalued in Asian Countries?"

Actually, women are greatly undervalued in every country. Society has accepted the greatest con in history that males are the superior gender when in fact women are far superior to us males. Yes it is correct that over all, 105 males are born for every 100 girls because males are the weaker sex at every age. Some researches even indicate 150 males are concieved for there to be 105 males born because this male weakness starts in the womb which indicates that most of the miscarriages would have been male.

The Wall Street Journal has an article called "The War on Girls" It points out that since 1970 over 163 million girls have been aborted by parents seeking sons. Why anyone would want to abort someone that would be far superior to a male is beyond me.
It goes on to say "In nature, 105 boys are born for every 100 girls. This ratio is biologically ironclad. Between 104 and 106 is the normal range, and that's as far as the natural window goes. Any other number is the result of unnatural events.

Yet today in India there are 112 boys born for every 100 girls. In China, the number is 121—though plenty of Chinese towns are over the 150 mark."

The author states that "such imbalances are portents of Very Bad Things to come. "Historically, societies in which men substantially outnumber women are not nice places to live," she writes. "Often they are unstable. Sometimes they are violent."


Should it be any surprise? The more MALES we have, the worse society becomes? Maybe The S.C.U.M. Manifesto by Valerie Jean Solanas is right. Maybe the best way to cure our problems is to eliminate at least half of the MALE population! After all, if we have a barrel of apples, we do not throw the good apples out to get rid of the rotten ones and in humans, the rotten apples are far more often the MALES. Yes, sometimes we have to throw out some good ones to get all the bad ones but as long as they have testicles, that is fine with me. At least it will be safe for all women and girls since half of the males will be gone. And some wonder why many of us know that women are the superior sex and we males are by far the inferior sex.

One thing we know from this article (War on girls) is that there are fewer wars and much less violence when there are far fewer males then women. Would that not tell us the problem is not because of women but because of those who are inferior to women because they have a a PENIS and TESTICLES and the MALE brain that goes with them

In Papua New Guinea Women found a way to stop their males from killing each other. They performed infanticide to end tribal war but they only killed the males. For several years every male that was born was killed and the adult males were too dumb (like most males) to figure out what was going on. I guess they did know that males are the weak sex and they thought all the males were stillborn. (Yet none of the girls were)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,460166,00.html

Maybe these people are right, if we kill about half the MALE population, it will stop wars or at least it will keep the males from killing women and children. If either gender is to be killed or selected out, I would rather it be males even though I am a male myself.

I have to agree with the comment about women being undervalued in every country. It is nice to see a male admit it but it is not surprising to me. I use to think males were superior until my husband (boy friend at that time) showed me that women were the superior sex.

He gave me a book called "The Natural Superiority of Women" It shows solid evidence that women are the superior gender. It starts by showing that every human starts out female but it goes on to say that at one certain stage of development something "goes horribly wrong" and some of us (myself included) end up to be male. In short, we males are a mutation of a female. (Seldom is a mutation good)

One problem is that the last update of this book was in 1999 and since than a lot more has been learned showing women to be even more superior to males than it was thought at that time.

Recently there have been several news items regarding this. Some say males will disappear totally. Others say we will still be around but not really needed. Before machines were invented, males were needed for their muscles for physical work. Now that machines can do all of that, males are not needed as much as we once were.

Now there is a book that can fill in that 21 year gap.

"Man Down" by Dan Abrams

Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt That Women Are Better Cops, Drivers, Gamblers, Spies, World Leaders, Beer Tasters, Hedge Fund Managers, and Just About Everything Else

Someone said that now that women are getting an equal chance, women are surpassing males in almost every area. This is what Abrams said is the reason for this book.

"There’s a lot more evidence now. A lot of the studies from the book are from the last three years. It’s only been in the last twenty or so years, that women have been on a relatively even playing field in terms of work to do many of these studies. We weren’t able to make fair comparisons before, because women were a fraction of the working world. Now we’re see women taking over the majority in many professions. But only recently has there been enough time to look back to compare men versus women and only recently has there been real interest."

Abrams said a vast majority of lead researchers are male, but the broad trend trackers are women. so it may be that males are beginning to wake up and smell the roses that male superiority is history. Actually, males never were superior as women have always been superior to males.

Women have a better sense of smell, taste, and new research is suggesting the fact that women tend to endure pain more makes them more immune to it. It’s the old aphorism, “That which doesn’t kill me makes me stronger.” Women survive injury better than males do and 77% of those who die in traffic accidents are male. Women have 34 more nerve fibers per square centimeter of facial skin, while men have an average of 17. This brings up sexual pleasure. Women have hundreds of times more nerve endings in their vagina than males have in their penis and as a result a male's orgasm pales to a woman's. A woman feels it in all of her body for several moments and it can be repeated many times in a short time. A male's orgasm consists of a few throbs of his prick and it is over in usually much less than a minute. He usually cannot have another one for several hours. Someone said that it is like Niagara Falls for women, a dripping faucet (no pun intended) for males.

Women live an average of five years longer than men. The reasons for this are both genetic and behavior-based. First of all, women have stronger immune systems, again due to estrogen which aids the fight against disease-inducing enzymes. But women are also less likely to engage in risky behavior. Almost all of the Darwin Award winners are male. Usually 9 or more males kill themselves for each woman who does to get this award.

Women make better doctors. While forty percent of doctors are women, 80 percent of those under investigation for medical misconduct or incompetence are male. In the U.S., there were similar findings. Male physicians were twice as likely to be sued as women


He does list things males are better at: Males are better at parking, they’re better dieters, they have better distance vision, and they read maps better. Males do have larger muscles, so they tend to be better at some sports but women far excel males in endurance sports.

A woman's body can more efficiently process oxygen. When it comes to ultra-marathons—say, a 135 mile race without sleep—women can beat men. Remember the first male that ran a marathon died and when we read about someone dying while playing sports or running a race, it is far more likely it will be a male.

When looking at sex change operations, we will notice that a few hundred males want to become women for every woman who wants to become a male. Still these males would not become members of the superior gender as their DNA would still be male thus keeping them inferior to women.

Even in combat, women are better sharp shooters and if the battle of the sexes every turned into a real war, we males would not have a chance. All the males would all be dead while 3/4 or more women remained alive and unharmed.

It is a given that males need women far more than women need males but lets count our lucky stars that most women still want us around.

With Montagu's book, my husband use to think women had a 80 out of 100 advantage over males. With his last update in 1999 he raised that to 85 to 100. Now with this new book, it looks like women have a 95 to 100 advantage over males and if it keeps up since women have grown so much in the last 20 to 30 years, soon they will have total advantage over anyone that has the misfortune of being born with testicles. My husband also said from what he sees around him,he is glad women are the SUPERIOR gender and MALES are the inferior one.

Someone said another article that "we should use psychopaths in war and said that only males should be killed in wars. I have often wondered how males feel about this. Especially in those areas where a victory killed all the males in the society they conquered."

Most women feel sorry for the males but we would be glad we were not male but again, almost all women are glad we are not males. As several have said here, we know we women are superior to the males so why would we want to lower ourself to be a male?

I could not agree more that it is the males who are killed and actually and I think society does too. After all, are not wars fought mostly by males and until recently, did they not try to make sure only males were killed in war? If only the males are being killed, there is very little outcry and hardly any from most of the men in our society. I have seen that it has been mostly males who have advocated that only males be killed in wars here on this comment board but I guess that is to be expected as that is the general feeling in society, to keep women safe. We see that when someone takes men and women as hostages, we want them to let the women go.

I know one man asked "do women approve of protecting their gender at the expense of the males"

I would have to say yes we do approve of keeping women save even if males die. I think many others do too. Look at the Titanic. It was women and children first (and girls were given priority over boys) Most of the women were given places in the life boats while most of the males remained on the sinking ship knowing that the males would die. Still few of the males or women complained about this. They expected the males to die to save the women. It still is expected by both men and women that males will give their life to save women.

In one college class I had on ethics, we were given a survey with some questions on it.

One was that if you came on the scene of an accident and there was a male and a female who had terminal injuries unless they had immediate first aide and you could do it, which would you save, the male or the female given the same set of facts, they appeared to be the same age, and they had the same life threatening injury (In short, everything about them was the same except one was a female, the other a male.

A second question was something like if we were driving down the road and we lost control of the car except for steering and we had to hit one of two groups of people, one with lets say 10 males, the other with 10 females, which group would you hit.

We had to list reasons also.

After it was all tallied, almost everyone said they would save the female in the first event. Most (about 90%) said they would hit the males in the second. In short, it would be the males who would die in both situations. More of the males (95%) in the class said they would save the woman or they would hit the males. About 80% of the women said the same thing (in short, it would be the males they let die)

The professor did say that this would be the best choice as the woman or women could be pregnant thus they could be saving two or more lives and although he was a male himself, he also indicated that women can survive injuries better than males so it was more likely the first aide would be effective but that this could not be reversed when hitting a group of people because hitting the males would still be a better choice because like it or not, males are as a whole, the more expendable gender.

What he said after that did shock many of the women because he said women were the superior gender so if you can only save one, save the woman. My husband already showed me this but it was interesting that when the class was asked to show by a raise of hands if they thought women were superior to males, almost all of the women raised their hands and it was surprising to see that half the males admitted women were superior too. Many of them seemed very reluctant to raise their hand but as a few men showed they had the balls to raise their hands, a lot of other males grew a pair of balls and raised theirs too. My husband would say the ones that did not raise their hands are pricks but I do know a lot of women who have bigger balls than a lot of males.

One man even said "I am glad women are the SUPERIOR gender and MALES are the inferior one."

I am glad too and since more people are accepting that women are superior to males, it only makes sense that it would be the males who are eliminated. Besides, males are more expendable than women in any case.

Maybe if we taught this in every grade school, girls would accept that they are superior and boys would learn to respect girls and instead of the world being short millions of women, women would be valued. As the guest said, if the world is going to short change itself of either gender, it should be the males. "Would that not tell us the problem is not because of women but because of those who are inferior to women because they have a a PENIS and TESTICLES and the MALE brain that goes with them" That says it all but I would be blunt and put it where the males could understand, the problems stem from those who have a cock and a pair of balls because too many males only think with the brain in their dicks.

Sorry to be blunt here, but it is nothing short of a catastrophic disaster that this has been allowed to happen not only in india and china but these countries respective communities in other western countries aswell.
These are countries with the 2 biggest populations in the world and we all need to be concerned that the surplus men will cause a serious problem not only in their home countries but to the rest of the planet aswell.
(ie eventual world war 3 is possible, local wars first maybe and before that and what has been happening now will only get worse prostitution gangs/bride/child trafficking/kidnap/social unrest/violence/rape etc etc).
China is a superpower and india is becoming more developed aswell so why arent the respective governments/communities doing more about this? How about a simple advertisement campaign like girls are good, boys are bad? (not far from the truth is it in general if you remember the old rhyme sugar and spice and all things nice)
How about in india they bring about a law that scraps the dowry as that seems to be part of the problem over there? And try and empower girls/women and offer other incentives to have girls?
And in china they could offer incentives for having girls over boys aswell. The chinese preference/reasons for wanting boys over girls makes no sense whatsover and shortsighted parents who select males and abort female foetuses will be made to pay for this when there sons cant find partners , as theres something inherently evil about this choice in my opinion.
How about the chinese government bring in a law forcing couples to have at least one girl in a 2 child policy. Offer cash incentives to have girls.
Just in case your wondering Im a western man and have been influenced to have a girl partly because of these concerns (we dont want boys they are far more trouble than girls trust me), and I wish there were more people/couples like me in india/china/elsewhere who thought more like me.

Food for thought here but becoming overun with girls is far more preferable to the other way round , not least the safety of the planet as a whole.

Sorry to be blunt here, but it is nothing short of a catastrophic disaster that this has been allowed to happen not only in india and china but these countries respective communities in other western countries aswell.
These are countries with the 2 biggest populations in the world and we all need to be concerned that the surplus men will cause a serious problem not only in their home countries but to the rest of the planet aswell.
(ie eventual world war 3 is possible, local wars first maybe and before that and what has been happening now will only get worse prostitution gangs/bride/child trafficking/kidnap/social unrest/violence/rape etc etc).
China is a superpower and india is becoming more developed aswell so why arent the respective governments/communities doing more about this? How about a simple advertisement campaign like girls are good, boys are bad? (not far from the truth is it in general if you remember the old rhyme sugar and spice and all things nice)

How about in india they bring about a law that scraps the dowry as that seems to be part of the problem over there? And try and empower girls/women and offer other incentives to have girls?
And in china they could offer incentives for having girls over boys aswell. The chinese preference/reasons for wanting boys over girls makes no sense whatsover and shortsighted parents who select males and abort female foetuses will be made to pay for this when there sons cant find partners , as theres something inherently evil about this choice in my opinion.

How about the chinese government bring in a law forcing couples to have at least one girl in a 2 child policy. Offer cash incentives to have girls.

Just in case your wondering Im a western man and have been influenced to have a girl partly because of these concerns (we dont want boys they are far more trouble than girls trust me), and I wish there were more people/couples like me in india/china/elsewhere who thought more like me.
Food for thought here but becoming overun with girls is far more preferable to the other way round , not least the safety of the planet as a whole.

Sorry to be blunt here, but it is nothing short of a catastrophic disaster that this has been allowed to happen not only in india and china but these countries respective communities in other western countries aswell.
These are countries with the 2 biggest populations in the world and we all need to be concerned that the surplus men will cause a serious problem not only in their home countries but to the rest of the planet aswell.
(ie eventual world war 3 is possible, local wars first maybe and before that and what has been happening now will only get worse prostitution gangs/bride/child trafficking/kidnap/social unrest/violence/rape etc etc).
China is a superpower and india is becoming more developed aswell so why arent the respective governments/communities doing more about this? How about a simple advertisement campaign like girls are good, boys are bad? (not far from the truth is it in general if you remember the old rhyme sugar and spice and all things nice)

How about in india they bring about a law that scraps the dowry as that seems to be part of the problem over there? And try and empower girls/women and offer other incentives to have girls?
And in china they could offer incentives for having girls over boys aswell. The chinese preference/reasons for wanting boys over girls makes no sense whatsover and shortsighted parents who select males and abort female foetuses will be made to pay for this when there sons cant find partners , as theres something inherently evil about this choice in my opinion.

How about the chinese government bring in a law forcing couples to have at least one girl in a 2 child policy. Offer cash incentives to have girls.

Just in case your wondering Im a western man and have been influenced to have a girl partly because of these concerns (we dont want boys they are far more trouble than girls trust me), and I wish there were more people/couples like me in india/china/elsewhere who thought more like me.
Food for thought here but becoming overun with girls is far more preferable to the other way round , not least the safety of the planet as a whole.

"In Papua New Guinea Women found a way to stop their males from killing each other. They performed infanticide to end tribal war but they only killed the males. For several years every male that was born was killed and the adult males were too dumb (like most males) to figure out what was going on. I guess they did know that males are the weak sex and they thought all the males were stillborn. (Yet none of the girls were)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,460166,00.html

Maybe these people are right, if we kill about half the MALE population, it will stop wars or at least it will keep the males from killing women and children. If either gender is to be killed or selected out, I would rather it be males even though I am a male myself."

COUDNT AGREE MORE, SHAME IT CANT BE APPLIED TO INDIA AND CHINA AND ANYWHERE ELSE WHO ABORTS THE PRECIOUS GIRLS.

I am absolutely sickened by these gender inbalances/crimes that are being allowed to continue in india and china (and anywhere else like in north africa/middle east aswell as there respective ethnic communities in the west).
Its an act of serious criminality that these parents who make these choices (the fathers? evil fathers?) do not realise they are contributing to a worrying hell for themselves and their eventual sons after they have grown up and struggle to find a partner now being the part of the male surplus. They will end up involved in criminal gangs, trafficking girls from other countries, prostitution, bride snatching from western countries (which should be a criminal offence), childsex/childabuse, and some will become illegal immigrants trying to break there way into europe or the states. Some of the rest will go to jail and good riddance because they shouldnt have been brought into the world in the first place.
100 million girls and counting murdered, who should be on the planet now instead of 100 million+ surplus boys, I hope india and china rot in hell for this, but Im upset to say the entire planet could be destabilised because of it eventually.
Its BAD KARMA for the planet and
NO CHANCE FOR PEACE ON THIS PLANET WITH A SURPLUS OF MALES AND THAT IS A FACT

I am absolutely sickened by these gender inbalances that are being allowed to continue in india and china (and anywhere else like in north africa/middle east aswell as there respective ethnic communities in the west).
Its an act of serious criminality that these parents who make these choices (the fathers? evil fathers?) do not realise they are contributing to a worrying hell for themselves and their eventual sons after they have grown up and struggle to find a partner now being the part of the male surplus. They will end up involved in criminal gangs, trafficking girls from other countries, prostitution, bride snatching from western countries (which should be a criminal offence), childsex/childabuse, and some will become illegal immigrants trying to break there way into europe or the states. Some of the rest will go to jail and good riddance because they shouldnt have been brought into the world in the first place.
100 million girls and counting murdered, who should be on the planet now instead of 100 million+ surplus boys, I hope india and china rot in hell for this, but Im upset to say the entire planet could be destabilised because of it eventually.
BAD KARMA AND
NO CHANCE FOR PEACE ON THIS PLANET WITH A SURPLUS OF MALES AND THAT IS A FACT

Please restore the balance ! :) I want to see happy people!